TyraTech
<< < > >>
Search:
 
| Full PDF report | Print this page |
Annual Report & Accounts 2010 - Notes
slide
<< < > >>
the future, actual results ultimately may differ from the estimates. The Company does not expect changes in the estimates and assumptions used in these financial statements to materially affect these results within the next year. (l) Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the shor t-term maturity of these items. (m) Segment Information The Company previously considered itself to have two separate strategic business units that offer different products. They were managed separately because each business required different knowledge, skills and marketing strategies. These two business segments were pesticides and insecticides and sustainable solutions. In the first half of 2010, the Company decided to discontinue the business conducted in the sustainable solutions segment. The effect of that decision is discussed in the Discontinued Operations footnote (see Note 3). (n) Recently Issued Accounting Standards Revenue Recognition In April 2010, the AS B issued ASU 2010-17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, a consensus of the FAS B Emerging Task Force (ASU 2010-17), which provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. ASU 2010-17 is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or before June 15, 2010. The effect of ASU 2010-17 on the Company's expected future revenues will depend upon the structure of the Company's customer contracts and is still being analyzed. In October 2009, the FAS B issued 2009-13, Multiple- Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13). The new standard changes the requirements for establishing separate units of accounting in a multiple element arrangement and requires the allocation of arrangement consideration to each deliverable based on the relative selling price. The selling price for each deliverable is based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE ) if available, third-party evidence if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price if neither VSOE or third-party evidence is available. ASU 2009-13 is effective for revenue arrangement entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The effect of this new guidance on the Company's expected revenues, which in turn depends upon the final structure of the Company's contracts with customers, is still being analyzed. (2) Li quidit y and Capit al Resources As of December 31, 2010, the Company had US $3,343,581 (2009: US $1,264,661) in cash and cash equivalents and had no indebtedness. The Company has had significant negative cash flows from operating activities since inception. The Company has produced monthly forecasts to the end of 2013 and based upon cash expected to be received through existing contracts, new contracts to be closed and the ability to control costs as a result of the Company's cost minimization program, with existing cash on hand and cash received from a share placing in May and December 2010, the Company's Directors believe that the Company will have sufficient cash to meet its working capital needs through the next twelve months. For this reason, the Company continues to apply the going concern basis of accounting. (3) Disconti nued Op erati ons During 2010, the Company discontinued the Sustainable Solutions segment which is reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations have been reclassified and are segregated in the consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The Company ceased operations of the Sustainable Solutions, LLC subsidiary effective March 31, 2010 and began liquidating the product inventory and settling the remaining liabilities with suppliers. This subsidiary was discontinued because its operations did not align with the Company's strategic plans. The consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 exclude 37 T y r a T e c h , I n c . : A n n u a l R e p o rt 2 0 1 0