TyraTech
<< < > >>
Search:
 
| Full PDF report | Print this page |
Annual Report & Accounts 2014 - Notes
slide
<< < > >>
TYRATECH • ANNUAL REPORT 2014 • PAGE 30 N o t e s t o C o n s o l i d at e d F i n a n c i a l S t at e m e n t s ( c o n t ' d ) Collaborative Revenue Non-refundable license fees are recognised as collaborative revenue when the Company has a contractual right to receive such payment, the contract price is fixed or determinable, the collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured and the Company has no further performance obligations under the license agreement. Multiple element arrangements, such as license and development arrangements, are analysed to determine whether the deliverables, which often include a license and performance obligations such as research and steering committee services, can be separated or whether they must be accounted for as a single unit of accounting. The Company recognises up front license payments as revenue upon delivery of the license only if the license has stand alone value and the fair value of the undelivered performance obligations, typically including research and/or steering committee services, can be determined. If the fair value of the undelivered performance obligations can be determined, such obligations would then be accounted for separately as performed. If the license is considered to either (i) not have stand alone value or (ii) have stand alone value but the fair value of any of the undelivered performance obligations cannot be determined, the arrangement would then be accounted for as a single unit of accounting and the license payments and payments for performance obligations are recognised as revenue over the estimated period of when the performance obligations are performed. Whenever the Company determines that an arrangement should be accounted for as a single unit of accounting, it must determine the period over which the performance obligations will be performed and revenue will be recognised. Revenue will be recognised using a proportional performance method. Revenue is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of non-refundable payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using the proportional performance method, as of each reporting period. If the Company cannot reasonably determine the estimated level of effort required to complete its performance obligation, then revenue is deferred until the Company can reasonably estimate its level of effort or the performance obligation ceases or becomes inconsequential. Significant management judgment is required in determining the level of effort required under an arrangement and the period over which the Company is expected to complete its performance obligations under an arrangement. In addition, if the Company is involved in a steering committee as part of a multiple element arrangement that is accounted for as a single unit of accounting, the Company assesses whether its involvement constitutes a performance obligation or a right to participate. Steering committee services that are not inconsequential or perfunctory and that are determined to be performance obligations are combined with other research services or performance obligations required under an arrangement, if any, in determining the level of effort required in an arrangement and the period over which the Company expects to complete its aggregate performance obligations. Deferred Revenue Amounts received prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts not expected to be recognised during the year ending 31 December 2015 are classified in long term liabilities. As of 31 December 2014, the Company has short-term deferred revenue of $0.1 million, (2013: $0.5 million) and long-term deferred revenue of $0.1 million (2013: $1.4 million) related to its collaborative revenue. Customer Concentrations The Company had $2.8 million of gross product revenue during the year (2013: $0 million). Two customers represented 84% and 14% of gross product revenue, respectively. These customers represented 97% and 1% of accounts receivable at 31 December 2014. (l) Equity Based Compensation Subsequent to 1 January 2006 stock based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Compensation expense is recognised only for